The equestrian statue of George III

C e/»J

,Z

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

l|ll 11" l|i|MI|i l1|i"iri|iMi|iii"'ii"iiiiiiiiii

0 014 108 806 3

Hollinger

pH 8.5

Mill Run F3.-1719

F 128

.64

.G3 U18

Copy 2

THE EQUESTRIAN STATUE OF
GEORGE III

AND THE

PEDESTRIAN STATUE OF
WILLIAM PITT

ERECTED IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

1770

By Alexander J. Wall

Ass't Librarian, the New York Historical Society

Reprinted from The Quarterly Bulletin, July, 1920

THE new YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY
1920

h

■Qb W|§

1'^>.,.^'/:C:

ni;'^

G K 0 K

KiN(i<H (;ii

THE GEORGE III STATUE ERECTED IN BOWLING GREEN 1770.
BY CHARLES M. LEFFERTS.

Gift

MIL 3c mo

THE STATUES OF KING GEORGE III AND THE

HONORABLE WILLIAM PITT ERECTED

IN NEW YORK CITY 1770

To the Colonial disturbances in the Colony of New York
brought about by the enactment of the "Stamp Act" on March
22, 1765 may be laid the cause for the erection in 1770 of the two
very interesting works of sculpture, the equestrian Statue of King
George HI and the pedestrian statue of the Honorable William
Pitt, later the Earl of Chatham. It is evident from contemporary
accounts that it was William Pitt (the Champion of the American
Cause in Parliament and his eflForts for the repeal of the Stamp
Act on March 18, 1766) whom the Colonists desired mostly to
honor in consideration of his many services for the Colonies during
those troublesome times. But the Legislature apparently could
hardly justify the expenditure of a sum of money to honor Pitt
and ignore the King, so we find the first suggestion for the famous
Equestrian Statue of King George III originating in the Assembly
of the Colony of New York in June, 1766 when for several months
previously the Statue of Pitt had been a matter of discussion which
resulted in a petition to the Assembly. That both these statues
should have been authorized and paid for simultaneously, both
executed by the same sculptor in London, both erected in the City
of New York the same year three weeks apart and both destroyed
six years later, one by the Americans and the other by the British
and all that is left of each of them should now rest in the New York
room of the New York Historical Society close by each other, al-
though they had strayed far apart for many years, are facts in the
story of the fate of these two most interesting local statues which
romance could not mould better. It is, therefore, impossible to
separate the accounts of these statues in history, as the story of
one relates to the other. The statue of George HI was the first
Equestrian Statue erected in America.^

One of the earhest mentions of the intention to erect the Pitt
Statue occurs in the Journals of Captain John Montressor who
under date of March 18, 1766 writes:

1 The Equestrian Statues of the IVorld, 1913, page 8. Two other Equestrian statues were
erected to George III according to this Hst, one in London and another in Liverpool.

38 T H E N E W-Y ORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

"The Sons of Liberty preparing to have a procession, with Sir
Jeifry Amherst's effigy, afterwards to burn it, as they say he pro-
posed to augment the mihtary forces in America, towards the
more effectual forcing the Stamp Act. Also propose, erecting a
statue of Mr. Pitt (as a friend) in the Bowling Green, on the iden-
tical spot where the Lieut. Governor's chariot was burned and to
name that Green 'Liberty Green' forever." "

Bowling Green, therefore, was first suggested for the Pitt
statue, but afterwards the king's equestrian statue was given this
imposing location while Pitt was placed at Wall and William
Streets.

William Pitt enjoyed the favor and gratitude of the populace of
both England and America. After the Repeal of the Stamp Act
the news from London under date of April 22, 1766 stated that "3.
great number of rings, set with the head of Mr. Pitt, are intended
to be sent as presents to some of the principal merchants in Amer-
ica, by their correspondents in this city," ^ while on May 3, 1766 it
was reported from London in the New York press that a handsome
medal had been struck the size of a crown-piece bearing the head of
Mr. Pitt with his name and on the reverse the inscription, "The
man who, having saved the parent, pleaded with success for her
children" and on the same day it was announced that the fine
statue of Mr. Pitt to be placed in the Guildhall at Cork, Ireland,
was finished by Mr. Wilton, at an expense of 500 pounds and that
it bore the following inscription:

The Right Honorable William Pitt.

This Statue was erected by

The Corporation and Citizens of Cork,

As a lasting Memorial of Gratitude.

Anno 1766.

Nil oriturum alias nil ortum tale fatentes. Hor"^

Whether this statue, which is still standing in the corridor of
the Crawford Municipal School of Art, in Emmet Place, Cork,
Ireland,^ was the original inspiration for the sons of Liberty to do

2 The New York Historical Society Collections, 1881, p. 353.

2 Holt's New York Gazette, July 3, 1766, Supp.

4 JVeyvians New York Gazette, June 30, 1766.

* Hart's Peale's Allegory of William Pitt, 1915, page 5.

QUARTERLY BULLETIN

39

yj6 •:. /-/^' ytj'

■'■■ /

40 T H E N E W-Y ORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

likewise in the Colonies or the Citizens of Cork conceived the idea
from the Colonies, is difficult to determine, but the fact is that the
project was first carried out in Ireland and by the same sculptor,
Joseph Wilton, who later executed the work for the Colonies.
Following closely upon the completion of the Cork statue. South
Carolina resolved on May 8, 1766 "that they will make provision,
for defraying the Expense of procuring from England, a Marble
Statue of the Right Honorable William Pitt, Esquire; to be erected
in this Province" ^ which (according to the Charleston press of the
day) met with many adverse comments.

On .June 19, 1766 a notice appeared in the New York papers
stating that "the Freemen and Freeholders of the City of New
York are requested to meet at the House of Mr. Richard Howard,
To-morrow in the Afternoon, at five o'clock, in order to choose a
Committee to instruct their Members to move in the House of
Assembly, that provision be made for erectmg a Statue to Mr. Pitt,
in Testimony of the Grateful sense they entertain of his Services
to the American Colonies; and to write Letters of thanks to all
those illustrious personages who have so zealously exerted them-
selves in both Houses of Parliament, in obtaining the Repeal of the
Stamp Act." '

This meeting resulted in a petition dated June 23, 1766 which
was presented and acted upon by the General Assembly of New
York the same day it was dated. It reads as follows:

A petition addressed to John Cruger, Leonard Lispenard, and
William Bayard, Esq" Representatives in the General Assembly
of the Freemen and Freeholders of the City of New York read as
follows :

"We, Freemen and Freeholders of the City of New York,
assembled at the Coffee-House the 23'' Day of June 1766, impressed
with the deepest Sense of Gratitude to all the Friends of Liberty
and America who exerted themselves in promoting the Repeal of
the Stamp Act, think it our indispensable Duty to endeavour, by
erecting a proper Monument, to perpetuate the Memory of so
glorious an Event, to the latest posterity.

We therefore earnestly entreat of, and strenuously recommend
to, you Gentlemen our Representatives, that 3 ou will move in the

* S. C. Hist, y Gen. Mag. Vol. 15, page 21, & Supp. A^. Y. Gazette, June 12, 1766.
^ Holt's N. Y. Gazette, June 19, 1766.

QUARTERLY BULLETIN

41

)-) mKr.'g

THE STATUE OF MARCUS AURELIUS IN ROME, ITALY, USED AS A MODEL FOR THE

GEORGE III STATUE.

House of Assembly, now sitting, for a Vote of the Honourable
House, to make provision for an elegant Statue of Brass of the
Rt. Hon. William Pitt, Esq.; whom we regard in the sacred Light of
having a second Time been the preserver of his Country.

Signed by Order, and at the Request of a considerable Number
of respectable Inhabitants of the City of New York, assembled as
above.

James DeLancey Isaac Low,

William Walton, Jun. Henry White,

John Thurman, Jun. J. Harris Cruger."^

8 ffeymans N. Y. Gazette, June 30, 1766.

42 T H E N E W-Y ORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

On June 23, 1766 Montressor states that subscription papers
were being carried about for a Statue of Mr. Pitt to be erected here.^

It will be noted that until now no aggitation had been carried on
for a statue of George III and not even a mention of it had been
made, until the General Assembly of New York acting upon the
above quoted petition took "into consideration the innumerable
and singular Benefits received from our most gracious soverign,
since the Commencement of his auspicious Reign, during which
they have been protected from the Fury of a cruel, merciless, and
savage Enemy; and lately from the utmost Confusion and Distress,
by the Repeal of the Stamp Act: In Testimony therefore of their
Gratitude, and the Reverence due to his Sacred Person and Char-
acter;

Resolved, That this House will make Provision for an Equestrian
Statue of His present Majesty, our Most Gracious Sovereign, to be
erected in the City of New York, to perpetuate to the latest pos-
terity, the deep Sense this Colony has, of the eminent and singular
Blessings derived from him, during His most auspicious Reign."

Whereupon Mr. Cruger moved "That in consideration of the
many eminent and essential Services done the Northern Colonies
by the Right Honourable William Pitt, Esq; but particularly in
promoting the Repeal of the late Stamp Act, and to perpetuate to
the latest posterity, the grateful Sense this Colony entertains on
that Account; provision might be made for erecting an elegant
Statue of Him in Brass: whereupon it was

"Resolved, That this House will provide ways and Means to
procure and pay for a Statue of the Right Honourable William
Pitt, Esq; accordingly. "i"

The General Assembly which enacted these Resolves was
prorogued on June 12, 1766 and took recess on July 3 having com-
pleted the business recommended to them by His Excellency Sir
Henry Moore, Governor of the Colony of New York. In his
Speech to the Assembly the Governor made no mention of the
statues" nor did he give his assent to the act passed providing for
them.^"

® N. Y. Hist. Soc. Collections 1881 page 374.

10 Weymafis The New York Gazette, June 30, 1766.

11 See Speech in JVeymans N. Y. Gazette, June 16, 1766.

^ See Four Acts assented to by the Governor in JVeymans N. Y. Gazette, July 7, 1766.

QUARTERLYBULLETIN 43

Apparently no further action was taken towards erecting these
statues until February 6, 1768 when the Assembly passed an act
reciting their previous action in June 1766 in consequence of which
"Robert Charles, Esq. the Agent of this Province was directed
with all expedition to cause the before mentioned" statues to be
completed in the best manner and authorized Sir William Baker
Knight and Robert Charles Esquire, of the City of London, out of the
monies now in their hands belonging to the Colony, to pay Robert
Charles, one thousand pounds for the Equestrian Statue of his
Majesty and live hundred pounds for the statue of the Right
Honorable William Pitt, Esquire. ^^

On the same day that the New York Assembly voted to provide
for the erection of the two statues, June 23, 1766, the Commons
House of Assembly of the Province of South Carolina voted seven
thousand pounds for a marble Statue of William Pitt to be erected
in that province and ordered the public Treasurer to procure good
bills of Exchange to the amount of one thousand pounds Sterling
and remit the same to their agent towards the payment of the
Statue. ^^

The work of executing the George HI statue as well as the two
statues of William Pitt was entrusted to Joseph Wilton (1722-1803)
the noted sculptor of the period, one of the founders of the Royal
Academy of Arts, who created the monument in Westminster Abby
erected to General Wolfe who fell at Quebec.

On May 9th, 1770 it was stated at a meeting of the Common
Council that the statue of George HI was daily expected from
England and that it was the desire of Lieut. Governor and Council
to erect it in some part of the Bowling Green, fronting the fort,
who requested leave of the Corporation for that purpose, which was
granted. ^^

On June 4, 1770 it was announced that the ship Britannia
Captain Thomas Miller, had brought over "the Statues of his
Majesty and Mr. Pitt now Earl of Chatham, "^^ and the Common
Council was again appealed to on June 25th, 1770, on behalf of his
Majesty's Council and the City members of the General Assembly

13 Colonial Laws of New York, 1894, pages 1002-3.

" S. C. Hist, y G'en. Mag. Vol. 15, page 22.

15 Minutes of the Common Council, City of New York, Vol. 7, pages 212-21'

1^ New York Gazette y Weekly Mercury, June 4, 1770.

44 T H E N E W-Y ORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

for permission to erect the Pitt statue in "Wall Street, opposite
to the houses of John Thurman and Evert Bancker, nearly where
the pump now stands," which was granted accordingly.^'^

With the arrival of the statues and the necessary permission
granted for erecting them in their respective locations, the stage was
set for carrying out the projects started four years previously.

The newspapers of the day describe the ceremonies at the
erection of King George III statue in the following words.

"Thursday last (August i6, 1770) being the Anniversary of the
Birth Day of his Royal Highness Prince Frederick, an elegant
Equestrian Statue of his present Majesty, was erected in the Bowl-
ing-Green, in this City, near Fort-George. On this occasion, the
Members of his Majesty's Council, the City Corporation, the Cor-
poration of the Chamber of Commerce, the Corporation of the
Marine Society, and most of the Gentlemen of the City and Army
waited on his Honour the Lieutenant Governor, in the Fort, at his
request, where their Majesties and other loyal Healths were drank,
under a Discharge of 32 Pieces of Cannon from the Battery, accom-
panied with a Band of Music. This beautiful statue is made of
metal, richly gilt, being the first Equestrian one of his present
Majesty, and is the workmanship of that celebrated Statuary, Mr.
Wilton, of London. We hear that in a few days a Marble Pedestrian
Statue of Mr. Pitt, will be erected in Wall-Street." ^^

Another account says:
"Thursday last the Statue of his Majesty, King George the
Third, was fixed on the pedestal erected for it in Bowhng Green.
His Honour the Lieut. Governor having invited most of the principal
Gentlemen in the City, both Civil and Military; about 12 o'clock
they attended his Honour in Fort George, where his Majesty's
Health, &c. was drank, under the Discharge of 31 Cannon from the
Battery.

The following Inscription is on the pedestal of his Majesty's
Statue:

1^ Minutes of the Common Council, City of New York, Vol. 7, page 220.
1^ A^ezv York Journal or the General Advertiser, Aug. 23, 1770.

QUARTERLY BULLETIN

45

AN INCORRECT VIEW OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE KING'S STATUE,
PUBLISHED IN FRANCE.

ANDERSON'S INCORRECT WOODCUT OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE STATUE.

46 T H E N E W-Y ORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

Equestrian

Statue

of

George III

King of Great Britain, &c.

Erected MDCCLXX."^^

Lieutenant Governor Cadwallader Golden tells of this celebra-
tion in a letter to the Earl of Hillsborough dated New York August
i8, 1770. He says:

"An Equestrian guilt Statue, of the king, made by
direction of, and purchased by this Colony, came over in one of the
last ships from London. On Thursday last it was opened to view,
erected on its proper pedestal, in a square near the Fort and fronting
the principle street of the City. I was attended on this occasion
by the Gentlemen of the Council, and Members of Assembly then
in Town, the Magistrates of the City, the Clergy of all Denomina-
tions, and a very large number of the principal Inhabitants. Our
Loyalty, firm attachment and affection to His Maj*^® person was
expressed by drinking the kings Health, and a long continuance
of His reign, under a discharge of 32 pieces of Cannon, A Band of
music playing at the same time from the Ramparts of the Fort.
The General and Officers of the Army gave us the honor of their
company on the occasion. The Whole Company walked in pro-
cession from the Fort, round the Statue, while the Spectators ex-
pressed their Joy, by loud acclamations, the procession having
returned with me to the Fort, and the ceremony concluded with
great chearfulness and good humor." ^o

No mention is made in the correspondence of Lieut. Gov. Golden
to the erection of the Pitt statue on September 7, 1770 three weeks
after the above described ceremony nor is it recorded that he took
any part in the event which is described as follows:

Last Friday [September 7, 1770] the Statue of the Right Hon.
William Pitt, Esq., Earl of Chatham, was fixed on the Pedestal
erected for it in Wall-Street, amidst the Acclamations of a great
Number of the Inhabitants. The Statue is of fine white Marble, the
Habit Roman, the right Hand holds a Scroll, partly open, whereon

1^ New York Gazette or the Weekly Post Boy, Aug. 20, 1770.
^^ New York Historical Society Collections, 1877, page 226.

QUARTERLY BULLETIN

47

BULLET MOULD USED FOR MAKING THE LEADEN BULLETS

THE FRAGMENTS OF THE EQUESTRIAN STATUE OF GEORGE III.

48 THE ^NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

we read, Articuli Magna Charta. Libertatum; the left hand is ex-
tended, the Figure being in the Attitude of one delivering an Ora-
tion. On the South Side of the Pedestal, the following Inscription
is cut on a table of white Marble:

THIS STATUE

OF THE

RIGHT HONOURABLE

WILLIAM PITT,

EARL OF CHATHAM,

WAS ERECTED

AS A PUBLIC TESTIMONY OF THE GRATEFUL

SENSE THE COLONY OF NEW-YORK

RETAINS OF THE MANY EMINENT

SERVICES HE RENDERED AMERICA,

PARTICULARLY IN PROMOTING THE REPEAL

OF THE STAMP-ACT.

ANNO DOM. M,DCC,LXX.2i

Another contemporary newspaper prints the simple announce-
ment:

"Friday last a marble pedestrian Statue of Lord Chatham was
erected in Wall-Street in this city." "

The George III statue was placed in the center of Bowling
Green facing the Fort. It was modelled by Joseph Wilton after
the equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius in Rome, Italy, illustrated
in this article. No contemporary picture of the George III statue
has come down to us. An imaginative view of its destruction pub-
lished in France, showing the king as a pedestrian is wholly incor-
rect. Anderson's early wood engraving does not correspond with
facts. But we are indebted to our member, Mr. Charles M. Lef-
ferts, who after very careful study has reproduced for the Society
a correct representation of this Equestrian statue which we illus-
trate as a frontispiece. On May 3rd, 1771 the Common Council of
the city agreed to fence in the Green with iron rails and a stone
foundation according to a plan exhibited to the Board and con-
tracted with Richard Sharpe, Peter T. Curtenius, Gilbert Forbes

" New York Gazette or the Weekly Post Boy, Sept. 10, 1770.

''^ New York Gazette and the JVeekly Mercury, Sept. lo, 1770.

QUARTERLYBULLETIN 49

and Andrew Lyall to complete the same at a cost of £800.22 j^^
plan of Gerard Bancker, City Surveyor, is reproduced in this arti-
cle and gives interesting dimensions of the green oval.

From a contemporary map of the city we find that the Pitt
statue stood in the center of the roadway at the intersection of
Wall and William Streets.^'* This statue was also enclosed with a
railing for we learn that certain measurements for grading Smith
(now William) Street were made from "the railing at Mr. Pitt's
statue "25 in 1773.

Lieutenant Isaac Bangs of the American Army gives us a con-
temporary descriptive picture of the King's statue as he saw it on
April 19th, 1776:

"Near the Fort, is the Equestrian Statue of King George 3'^' a
present from himself to this City. The design was in imitation of
one of the Roman Emperors on Horseback. The Man George is
represented about 3^ larger than a Natural Man; the Horse, in pro-
portion, both neatly constructed of Lead gilt with Gold raised on a
Pedestal of White Marble, about 15 Feet high, enclosed with a very
elegant Fence about 10 feet high, the two lower feet Stone, the re-
mainder of open worked Iron; the enclosure was oval, containing
about 34 of ari acre of beautiful green. This, with several churches
and other Elegant buildings on either side of the spacious street,
forms a most beautiful prospect from the Fort." ^e

On February 6th, 1773 the General Assembly of New York
passed an Act to prevent the defacing of the statues erected in the
City of New York under a penalty of five hundred pounds fine or
one year in the common gaol." This legislation appears to have
been the result of some injury done the Pitt statue as on February
7th, 1774 it was ordered by the Common Council that the sum of
£6 be paid on account to Anthony Dodane "for work now by him
doing to the statue of Mr. Pit" and on March 23, 1774 the balance
of £16:6 was ordered paid to Anthony Dodane and William Valen-
tine "for repairing of the statue of the Earle of Chatham. "^s

^ Minutes of the Common Council City of New York, Vol. 7, page 281.

2^ Hill's Ms. Map of New York, 1782 in N. Y. H. S. Stokes' Iconography, Vol. 3, page
964, says the statue was west of William Street.

^ Minutes of the Common Council, City oj New York, Vol. 7, pages 443, 448.

^* Journal of Lieut. Isaac Bangs, 1890, page 25.

2^ Laws of New York, 1691-1773 N. Y. 1774, pages 719-20.

^* Minutes of the Common Council, City of New York, Vol. 8, pages 5, 16.

50 T H E N E W-Y ORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

The Declaration of Independence which was read on July 9,
1776 at the head of each brigade of the Continental Army posted
at New York brought destruction to the King's statue the same
evening through the jovous demonstrations of soldiers and inhabi-
tants. For in the words of the press of the day we read that "the
equestrian statue of George III which tory pride and folly raised
in the year 1770, was by the sons of freedom, laid prostrate in the
dirt; the just deserts of an ungrateful tyrant! The lead wherewith
this monument was made, is to be run into bullets, to assimilate
with the brains of our infatuated adversaries, who, to gain a pep-
per-corn, have lost an empire. 'Quos Deus vult perdere, prius de-
mentat.

Lieutenant Isaac Bangs under date of July 10, 1776 wrote:
"Last night the Statue on the Bowling Green representing George
Ghewelph alias George Rex was pulled down by the populace. In
it were 4,000 pounds of Lead and a Man undertook to take off 10 oz.
of gold from the Superficies, as both Man and Horse were covered
with Gold leaf. The Lead we hear is to be run up into musket
balls for the use of the Yankees, when it is hoped that the emana-
tions of the Leaden George will make as deep impressions in the
Bodies of some of his red coated and Tone Subjects." . . .^^

This Act met with the disapproval of General Washington who
expressed himself in the general orders to the army on July 10,
1776, viz.: "Though the General doubts not the persons who
pulled down and mutilated the Statue in the Broadway last night
were actuated by zeal in the public cause, yet it has so much the
appearance of a riot and want of order in the army, that he disap-
proves the manner, and directs that in the future these things shall
be avoided by the soldiery, and left to be executed by the proper
authority." ^^

The statue of the king was broken up and sent to Litchfield,
Conn., where according to the Wolcott family papers was moulded
into bullets by the ladies of that village and a memorandum made
as follows:

^^ Pennsylvania Journal and the Weekly Advertiser, July 17, 1776.
^** Journal of Lieut. Isaac Bangs 1890, page 57.
"^ Ford's Writings of Washington, Vol. 4, page 226.

QUARTERLY BULLETIN

51

52 T H E N E W-Y ORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

Cartridges

Mrs. Marvin 6,058

Ruth Marvin 1 1>592

Laura [Wolcott] 8,378

Mary Ann [Wolcott] 10,790

Frederic [Wolcott] 936

Mrs. Beach 1,802

Made by sundry persons 2,182

Gave Litchfield militia on alarm 50

Let the Regiment of Col. Wigglesworth have 300

Number of cartridges 42,088.^"

The Society possesses a bullet mould with a capacity for mak-
ing twelve bullets at one time which is said to have been used
when the king's statue was turned into the above mentioned car-
tridges. It was presented to the Society April 17, i860 by Mr,
Clinton Roosevelt, grandson of Colonel Peter T. Curtenius of the
Revolution.

The head of the king's statue escaped the fate which befell his
body and horse and was finally returned to England by Captain
John Montressor whose own words tell the story best, viz. :

"My hearing that the Rebels had cut the king's head off the
Equestrian Statue (in the centre of the Ellipps near the Fort) at
New York, which represented George the 3rd in the figure of
Marcus Aurelius, and that they had cut the nose off, dipt the
laurels that were wreathed round his head, and drove a musket
Bullet part of the way through his Head, and otherwise disfigured
it, and that it was carried to Moore's tavern, adjoining Fort Wash-
ington, on New York Island, in order to be fixed on a Spike on the
Truck of that Flagstaff as soon as it could be got ready, I imme-
diately sent Corby through the Rebel Camp in the beginning of
September, 1776, to Cox, who kept the Tavern at King's Bridge, to
steal it from thence, and to bury it, which was effected, and was
dug up on our arrival, and I rewarded the men, and sent the Head
by the Lady Gage to Lord Townshend in order to convince them
at home of the Infamous Disposition of the Ungrateful people of
this distressed Country." ^^

^^ Memorial of Henry Wolcott y his Descendants, 1881, page 163.
^^ New York Historical Society Collections, 1881, pages, 123-124.

QUARTERLYBULLETIN 53

'■.^s^--^^*i;^; '^ i«^^«®^

VIEW OF BOWLING GREEN 1783, SHOWING THE PEDESTAL OF GEORGE III STATUE

IN THE CENTER.

Governor Thomas Hutchinson in his diary under date of No-
vember 22, 1777 continues the narrative of events concerning the
king's head: "At Lord Townshend's Portman Square. Lady
Townshend asked me if I had a mind to see an instance of Ameri-
can loyalty? and going to the sopha, uncovered a large gilt head,
which at once appeared to be that of the King, which it seems the
rebels at N. York, after the Declaration of Independence, cut off
from the statue which had been erected there, and sent to Fort
Washington, in order to fix it on a pole or pike: but by some means
or other it was buried, and after the surrender of the Fort, Mon-
tressor took it into his possession, and sent it to Lord T., which he
rec'^ last night. The nose is wounded and defaced, but the gilding
remains fair; and as it was well executed, it retains a striking like-
ness." ^^

The top slab of the pedestal on which the King's charger stood
with one foot raised served several purposes before its final resting
place with this Society. During the Revolution it was brought
to Paulus Hoeck (Jersey City) and in 1783 was placed over the
grave of Major John Smith of the 42d or Royal Highland Regi-

^^ Diary and Letters of His Ex. Thomas Hutchinson, 1886, Vol. 2, page 167.

54 T H E N E W-Y ORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

ment who died July 25, 1783. When Jersey City was graded, the
slab was removed to the residence of Cornelius Van Vorst at Har-
simus, N. J., and used as a stepping-stone. In 1818 the stone was
removed to the residence of his grandson, Cornelius Van Vorst, N.
E. corner Wayne St. and Jersey Ave., where it remained until
October, 1874, when it was presented by him to the New York
Historical Society.

Four fragments of the leaden statue still partly gilt, also sur-
vived. They were found in April, 1871 on the farm of E. B.
Cooley at Wilton, Conn., and comprise the tail of the horse, part of
the saddle and saddle cloth and perhaps parts of the flank of the
horse, and altogether weigh about 200 pounds. Twenty members
of the Society subscribed five dollars each (one hundred dollars)
for their purchase and presented them to the Society, June 4, 1878.
How these fragments became separated from the main portions of the
statue is a matter of conjecture. Tradition in Wilton was that
these pieces had been thrown aside when the statue was being
transported through the town.^^

The white marble pedestal fifteen feet high on which the eques-
trian statue stood, remained in the center of Bowling Green until
1818 when it was removed. A correspondent in the New York
Evening Post of May 19, 181 8 asks why this pedestal which has
remained standing so many years should at that time be removed
and the materials thrown into the street. Expressing deep regret
the writer says: "Association entwined about this pillar a collec-
tion of events that no history could convey."

The Pitt statue fared no better than its illustrious companion,
for the British took possession of the City of New York September
15, 1776 and shortly afterward some British officers knocked off"
the head of the statue on St. Andrew's night, November 30, and to
this day no trace of it has come to light.^*' The headless and arm-
less form remained standing on its original site until on March 21,
1787, a petition of a majority of the proprietors of the Lots of
Ground in Wall Street requested that the street be regulated and
paved and that Pitt's statue which greatly obstructed the street be
removed." The paving was ordered and the matter of removing

^* Mass. Historical Society Proceedings, 2d Ser., Vol. 4, p. 297.

^^Wztsons J nnals of New York, 1846, pages 183-4. Stokes' Iconography, Vol. 3, page
964, says 1777.

'' Minutes 0} the Common Council, City of New York, Vol. i, page 285.

QUARTERLY BULLETIN

55

56 T H E N E W-Y ORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY

the Statue referred to the State Legislature, for in 1788 we learn
that a bill from the Senate "to authorize the Corporation of New
York to remove Pitt's statue was read a second time, and commit-
ted.38

This Act which was passed March 7, 1788 recited that the lev-
elling and altering of Wall Street rendered it inconvenient that the
remains of the statue should continue there,^'^ and at a Common
Council meeting held July 16, 1788 it was ordered in pursuance to
the above law that the Aldermen and Assistants of the Dock and
Eastwards be a committee to remove the remains of Pitt's statue
from Wall Street and that they deposit the same in some safe
place until the further order of the Board.^"

On November 19, 1788 a warrant on the Treasury was issued
to George Gosman for £5-7-3 for removing Pitt's statue.^^

From various accounts it appears that the statue was taken to
the Corporation Yard (Bridewell Yard) and from thence transfer-
red to the yard of the Arsenal near the Collect where it was seen in
1843 by Mr. John P. Watson, author of the A7inals of New York,
On August 12, 181 1 the Common Council resolved to present to
the Academy of Fine Arts the remains of the Pitt's statue which on
account of its excellent workmanship would be very acceptable to
them.^2 It is doubtful if the statue actually passed into the posses-
sion of that Society as it is not mentioned in their first exhibition
catalogue in 1816 nor in an account of the statuary belonging to
the Society published in 181 5.

It next appears in the possession of the "Fifth Ward Museum
Hotel," corner Franklin Street and West Broadway, where it re-
mained until the Executor's sale of the effects of the late Thomas
Riley (proprietor of the Museum Hotel), on February 12, 1864,
when it was purchased by Mr. Samuel F. Mackie and by him pre-
sented to the Society the same year.

The Charleston, S. C, statue of William Pitt was erected July
5, 1770 and now stands minus one arm in Washington Square near
where it originally stood. It met much the same fate as the New

s* New York Daily Advertiser, March 5, 1788.

39 Laws of New York, 1886, Vol. II, page 725.

*" Mifiutes of the Common Council, City of New York, Vol. I, page 381

^ Ibid., Vol. I, page 418.

*2 Minutes of the Common Council, City of New York, Vol. 6, page 676.

QUARTERLY BULLETIN

57

York statue, having had its right arm destroyed by a British Can-
nonball on April i6, 1780 and on December 12, 1791 the City
Council of Charleston authorized its removal which was accom-
plished March 14, 1794 and it was lodged in the Arsenal. In re-
moving it, the statue was allowed to fall and the head was severed.
In May, 1808 it was re-erected in the Orphan House yard where it
stood until 1881 when it was moved to Washington Square, where
it now stands, having been repaired to the extent of replacing the
head.-'^

The two statues while not replicas were about the same size. It
is of interest to note that Maryland in November, 1766 also passed
resolutions for a marble statue of Pitt, which wis not carried out,
while Dedham, Mass., erected a shaft with a wooden bust of Pitt
on top."*^

« See Full Account in S. C. Hist, 'd Gen. Mag., Vol. 15, pages 18-32.

« Hart's Peale's Allegory of Pitt, 1915, page 7, and Dedham Historical Register, Vol. i,
pages 121 and 140.

A. J. Wall.

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

R 014 108 806 3

LIBRARY OF (

II 11' II I r I II 1 1

0 014 10{

1
Milll

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

0 014 108 806 3

HolUnger

pH8.5

Mill Run F3..1719